Artificial Turf (Part 2)

September 5th, 2008 by Cindy

As many of you know, I have had various articles, (pro and con), regarding this Artificial Turf, Field Turf issue throughout the months.

The  Town of Cheshire is serious considering installing this turf at the Cheshire High School Football Field. A study committee, and let’s be honest here, made up of people who WANT the turf, are looking into its possible impact on a person’s health.

Next week, I am planning on making a stop at my old love school, yes I have so many, University of New Haven, which has artificial turf at Kayo Field, which is the schools soccer and lacrosse field, and is in the process of having artificial “blue colored” turf installed at the Football field. In fact, it probably is already set up. I will go by there while I am in the area on business and see if I can speak to some people about their feelings regarding the turf.

I know the Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal has questioned the turf’s safety, or more specifically, the rubber pellet underlay. I have actually read websites and blogs where people have stated they have gotten the pellets on their clothing or even in their mouths.

The Town of Westport has several artificial turf fields in their community. I am providing the information below. This article is from WESTPORTCT.GOV. The official Town of Westport website.

(9/4/2007) The Westport Parks and Recreation Department has said that continued use of synthetic athletic turf fields in Westport is warranted despite concerns expressed by some saying they may adversely affect the health of users.

In a statement, Parks and Recreation Director Stuart McCarthy said: “The Westport Parks and Recreation Department continues to support the installation of synthetic athletic turf as a safe alternative to grass playing fields.

“While we are constantly reviewing all available information on this subject we have seen no evidence that playing on these fields is unsafe. There is ample evidence that these fields perform well, use fewer pesticides and improve playing conditions and athlete safety over the current over-used grass fields.”

McCarthy said the department encourages continued testing of these products to assure the safety of users of these playing fields.

“To date, while several studies have identified chemical compounds associated with the rubber infill materials used in this current technology, not one of the studies has concluded that the presence of those compounds pose a danger to human health or the environment,” he said.

In a statement issued following the latest reports of testing done by the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station’s chemical laboratory, Brian Toal  supervising epidemiologist, Environmental and Occupational Health Assessment Program, Environmental Health Division of the State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health, wrote:

“We have reviewed a great deal of the literature on potential human health risk from rubber used in synthetic turf fields. We have not seen any information that would lead us to recommend against installing such fields based on potential chemical exposures or health risk from those using the fields.

“At this time we do not plan on issuing a recommendation against installation of synthetic turf fields. It is important to note we do not have authority to issue a moratorium. If we felt there was a serious health risk from such fields we would work with the Connecticut Department of Education and DEP to issue a recommendation to schools. At this point no such action is planned by DPH.”

McCarthy noted that the current generation of synthetic athletic turf has been in use for approximately 8 to10 years.

There are currently more than 1,000 installations nationwide and dozens in the local area. Current installations are in place in nearly every state, in professional stadiums, college campuses (including state universities and colleges), urban and suburban parks and municipal schools and recreation facilities both indoors and outdoors, he said.

The Parks and Recreation Department is not aware of any state or federal agency which has banned, restricted or warned against the use of this product, McCarthy said.

“The Parks and Recreation Department will continue to review information and public health statements regarding the use of synthetic athletic turf as we go forward,” he said.

While I was surfing around the Town of Westport’s official website, I noticed something I had alluded to a few months ago. Apparently, the Westport’s First Selectman writes a monthly column on Town happenings. The website even lists archives of his past columns so readers can enjoy past posts.

I suggest Town Manager Michael Milone give this site a once over and see what a great idea this is.  He calls it “Gordon’s Journal.”

The First Selectman even invites readers to e-mail him directly with an “email Gordon” link. UPDATE: The commenter is right. When you click on “e-mail Gordon” you get directed to a page with a phone and fax number. Maybe he was getting too many E-Mails!!

I know this man is good First Selectman because his first name is Gordon!!

So here is the link to Westport’s official website:

click here

It’s time to have “Michael’s Journal” and it is time to see our Town Manager get on a more intimate basis with the people of this community, not just the FIVE Democratic Town Council members.

I would like to see the Town Manager go around the Fall Festival that I will NOT be attending this year. and do a meet and greet with as many folks as possible. In fact, set up a Town Hall booth and man it with as many staff people as possible and talk to your constituents!!! The Police Chief should do the same thing!!!

One Response to “Artificial Turf (Part 2)”

  1. Duncan Says:

    OK, I’ll bite at this hook, however the link led to no email for Gordon, so…I’ll just post this and let you guys get it to Gordon. Here, folks is the real scoop that none of the big boys want you to know. The standard crumb rubber (and sand) fields have problems. They will deny what is written here, but here is our statement. also, check the website and blog targapro.com
    Recently, I have been asked to produce a quick reference guide about the health issues related to synthetic turf for our company, TargaPro; by a number of our existing clients that are fielding questions from concerned parties. As we are bidding and currently working a number of sites where artificial turf has become a major issue, I have prepared a statement that obviates those concerns. I have supporting documents for the statements below upon request. Following the CPSC ruling that “there is no problem with the turf”, I see a constant stream of misinformation pertaining to the issue of lead in synthetic turf and the resulting health issues. The CPSC was correct, there is no real problem with the turf, but only the turf fibers were tested, no other components were considered. The full picture is encapsulated below.

    The issue is not lead in the new fields, only a few older fields had/have lead in the fibers.
    -The lead content issue is a result of fields that were installed many years ago, made with nylon yarns.
    -Currently, most all fields are produced with fibers that have low lead content levels and are of no concern.
    -We use tested polyethylene fibers and yarns for our turf. The test results for lead on TargaPro’s EcoGreen66 Synthetic Turf are - 6 MG/KG as opposed to the standard of 85 MG/KG.

    There are, in fact, three real issues:

    1) Carcinogen runoff from the infill.
    -Outdoor fields begin to gas off carcinogens at 120 degrees; indoor fields have no heat-driven issues.
    -Cryogenic and ambient ground rubber, and silica sand, used for infill material may result in carcinogen runoff, gas off of harmful chemicals, and the heat island affect, when used on outdoor fields.
    -TargaPro utilizes an Anti-Microbial Infill (AMI) called Organite™ as a non-carcinogenic, environmentally clean alternative exceeding all HIC values, G-Max and P-Max requirements, and contains no rubber.

    2) Bacteria-harboring infill and bio-health related issues.
    -Crumb rubber and sand mixed infills can harbor harmful bacteria that leave athletes subject to infection.
    -TargaPro uses the Anti-Microbial Infill as a health agent also which kills bacteria on the molecular level addressing bio-health related issues such as MRSA.

    3) Disposal of spent fields
    -The backings used for synthetic turf construction will become an issue related to landfill disposal of the fields following the typical 8 year guarantee. Urethane backings are not considered recyclable.
    -TargaPro’s EcoGreen66 Synthetic Turf uses a polyolefin, three layer-woven backing that attributes the entire system as 100% recyclable.

Leave a Reply